Monday, October 2, 2023

Ongoing medical cognition projects in medicine department

Ongoing projects in medicine other than the departmental post graduate thesis are all centred around "medical cognition" and optimizing clinical complexity using medical cognition tools. 


Other than routine medical cognition tools of  system 1 eyeballing pattern recognition, we use routine tools of system 2 asynchronous intelligence aka primordial AI aka academic learning to solve real patient problems.

Developing the Medical metacognition problem statement at the beginning of the introduction to all our ongoing projects is because, it's at the core of all our projects using both system 1 and 2 cognitive processing:

System 2 thinking began as an asynchronous academic tool to make communication and thinking slower to suit our individual workflows. 

However this essence of academics also makes our three dimensional existential reality two dimensional as that helps to somehow better analyze our three dimensional existence manifest in daily random events and even manipulate the randomness toward apparently improved outcome events.

Of all the routine system 2 tools, we have been largely enamoured by a few that we have written about  in the past and  continue to use them daily in our community patient follow up and family adoption through online PaJR groups which are the online components of our case based blended learning ecosystem CBBLE and the two have evolved from what has been often described in the past as "user driven healthcare" which has it's own big fat text book here :  https://www.amazon.in/User-Driven-Healthcare-Narrative-Medicine-Collaborative/dp/1609600975
as well as had a journal with the same name since 2011 here: https://www.igi-global.com/journal/international-journal-user-driven-healthcare/41022

More about our tryst with "using medical cognition tools to optimize clinical complexity" in this 2023 guest lecture at AIIMS, Bhopal archived here: https://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2023/10/medicine-department-presentations-2023.html?m=1

Ethical clearance obtained for this major project stem here : http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2023/04/?m=0

Clinical professional development CPD organized on the theme of optimizing clinical complexity is 

Completed and published medical cognition projects :

Clinical complexity and PaJR tools 2023:  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37335625/


Five ongoing old projects on the above theme :

1) Creating dynamic user driven ontologies : http://userdrivenhealthcare.blogspot.com/2022/?m=0





5) Collective, user driven conversational contextual peer review of real time open access research submissions and creation of dynamic user driven learning community ontologies UDLCO 



Current journal UDLCO :

Dr Tella Shruthi :



Ongoing projects previously shared in  2021 in the dsir template on request :


We can broadly divide our "medical cognition" into the right and left path. 

The right path projects are reasonably understandable from a modern perspective, while the left path projects are slightly post modern and may not be included in the offical departmental lists although they will still be linked appropriately in case someone visiting this site is curious. 



New projects using medical cognition tools :

1) Ongoing project : Sleep cycle longitudinal follow up study using frugal user driven sleep labs to determine the  impact of sleep patterns on development of NCDs. Elective student collaborator, Avinash Gupta from Bhairahva, Nepal and intern Dr Parvez Ansari from KIMS Narketpally, Prof Monika Pathania, AIIMS, Rishikesh 

Plant model collaborator TIFR CUBE lab Dr MC Arunan https://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/research/past-projects/gnowledge-lab, Ms Swaha Saha, NJP and Dr Dinesh Datta, KMC, Warangal : 


Animal model TIFR CUBE lab collaborator Dr MC Arunan https://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/research/past-projects/gnowledge-lab, Ms Swaha Saha, NJP
Dr Dinesh Datta, KMC, Warangal 


Pilot sleep studies done in our wards as part of the routine workflow:




A unique sleep pattern from personal tracker data and n of 1 intervention https://classworkdecjan.blogspot.com/2019/05/42-f-with-severe-regular-edema-with_17.html?m=1



Previous log of our ongoing sleep project in dsir template as requested from principal's office: http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/02/per-dsir-template.html?m=0

2) Ongoing project : Gait analysis: normal and abnormal patterns in relation to illness outcomes  PG student collaborator Dr Himaja, Intern Dr Kshitij from KIMS Narketpally. 
From University of Hyderabad, collaborator, Prof Nagendra and Dr Irfan 

Past work on this project by UoH :




Recent data capture from our ward :



3) Life style medicine project: Effect of daily energy intake monitoring in the form of food plate images and energy output in the form of hourly activities in improving outcomes through regular PaJR continuity
External collaborators from Pune studying AI tools in food plate optimization toward better outcomes and Prof Pathania with her life style pdcc student: https://aiimsrishikesh.edu.in/a1_1/?page_id=1081

Resources from and for our PaJR patients : http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2023/09/?m=0

4) Utilizing LLM tools to assess interns clinical competence depicted in their online learning portfolios. External collaborator Mr Rahul Kulkarni from Pune. https://www.linkedin.com/in/rahul10100/ and here's his video that shows his plan for how he can help mentor our health professional students and patients toward better life outcomes: https://youtu.be/wqZvp83cfbs?feature=shared

Internship assessment done by LLM showcased here as a single sample : http://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2023/09/submitted-internship-competence.html?m=1

5) Creating sample question paper through clinical vignettes taken from online learning portfolio case reports and reshaped into questions (MCQs, Long essay, short essay) using a large language model and human professor supervised learning
Project collaborators: Dr Tella Shruti, Dr Dinesh Datta, Mr Rahul Kulkarni


6) Creating persistent clinical encounters through first contact physician user driven EMRs followed by patient user driven PHRs (patient journey records PaJRs) collectively archived in dynamic case reports (EHRs):
Collaborators: Dr Manogyna intern and UGs from 3rd, 5th and 9th semester 

7) Early clinical exposure to patient vulnerability in social media and need to champion their privacy confidentiality through meticulous removal of patient and institutional identifiers along with valid informed consent during the conversion of three dimensional system 1 patient data to 2 dimensional system 2 patient data archived and continually evolving in dynamic online learning portfolios.







Medicine department presentations 2023-17

2023:


Faculty :

10 August 2023: AIIMS Bhopal: invited guest lecture 

Image of invitation :






YouTube link to lecture:


May 5, 

Y20 participants at AIIMS, Rishikesh
from our 3 Elective students, Vivek Podder,  post doctoral Miami cancer institute, Pranab Chatterjee, John Hopkins post doctoral  BhagyaJyoti Priyadarshini, Orissa and Dinesh Datta KIMS UG now KMC PG,  

Image :




Panelists, AI healthcare 


Above link can be scrolled to 6 hrs 27 minutes to find our students 


8 February 2023: Oman Medical college : invited guest lecture 

Image of invitation 




YouTube link to lecture :


PGs:

25th January 2023 : CPD on optimizing clinical complexity 

Dr Haripriya and Prof Michele Meltzer, Thomas Jefferson university, Philadelphia  

YouTube link :


Dr Chandana and Prof Sadhana Sharma, Malla Reddy Medical College, Hyderabad 

YouTube link :


Dr Raveen and Prof Murthy, Department of Surgery, KIMS, Narketpally 


Dr Saicharan and Prof Meltzer, Thomas Jefferson university, Philadelphia  


Faculty 

Key note address with Prof Joachim Sturmberg's, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle





2022:

PGs :

Dr Rashmita with Prof Binod Dhakal, Medical college of Wisconsin, https://www.mcw.edu/find-a-doctor/dhakal-binod-md



Dr Vaishnavi with Prof Meltzer, Thomas Jefferson university, Philadelphia  


Dr Aashita with Prof Akshay Anand, PGIMER, Chandigarh 


Overall write up on the Clinical problem solving CPD 2022: 






Sunday, October 1, 2023

End of posting osce and mini-CEX results announcement for 2018 batch posted in general medicine for August and September 2023

Summary : Pragmatic OSCEs and mini-CEX were conducted for each of the following interns listed below who were interned to the department of medicine for 45 days largely in August and September 2023, everyday in batches of four, while assessing them summatively on the days they were working face to face with the assessor both at OPD and IPD as well as following them up formatively everyday through their work logged in their online learning portfolios as well as PaJR groups in a user driven manner.  

And user driven submissions of online portfolio links on learning themes for 360 degree peer feedback and assessment submitted here :  https://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2023/09/submitted-internship-competence.html?m=1

Current batch list of interns and their quantitative and qualititative  assessments :

41 K  TEJASWINI 


Quantitative evaluation: 55/100
No extension (pass) 


Qualitative evaluation: Can do better 


42  K CHERISH 


Quantitative evaluation : 60/100
No extension (pass) 


Qualitative evaluation  : Takes initiative, trainable 
Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 


43 K NIKHIL SAI 


Quantitative evaluation : 65/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Takes initiative, trainable, Hardworking, sincere

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 

44 K VENGALA PRASANNA 


Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 



45 K SAMPATH


Quantitative evaluation : 60/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, Hardworking, sincere

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 


46 K PHANI KEERTHANA


Quantitative evaluation : 55/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, sincere

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 


47 K  SHIREESHA 


Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more 


48 K CHETANA


Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


49 K TULSYAN



Quantitative evaluation : 55/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


50  K YAMINI ( went on USMLE leave midway )


Extension : 30 days 

51 KSHITIJ SHARMA



Quantitative evaluation : 55/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, Takes initiative 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


52 K  NIKHILESHWAR


Quantitative evaluation : 45/100
Extension 20 days  

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, Late starter 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


53 LASYA REDDY PESARU



Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable, Takes initiative 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 

54  M  PARDHU ( did not report atall) 

Extension  60 days 


55 M  SRIBINDU


Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


56 M  VINEETH


Quantitative evaluation : 30/100
Extension 30 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if he's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


57 M  SANTHOSHINI



Quantitative evaluation : 40/100
Extension 20 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if she's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


58 M AARTHI PRIYANKA


Quantitative evaluation : 50/100
No extension (pass) 

Qualitative evaluation  : Trainable

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


59 M BHARGAVI




Quantitative evaluation : 40/100
Extension 20 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if she's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 

60 M HEMANTH

Quantitative evaluation : 40/100
Extension 20 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if he's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 

FMG POSTED FROM 

1 st AUG TO 30 SEPT 

FMG 6 - Lakshmi Bhavya Popuri

Quantitative evaluation : 30/100
Extension 30 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if she's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 



FMG 7 - Mahitha Pandurao Akireddy


Quantitative evaluation : 45/100
Extension 20 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if she's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


FMG 8 - Mallavarapu Ramya Sri 

Quantitative evaluation : 40/100
Extension 30 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if she's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


FMG 9 - Mohammad Ashraf 

Quantitative evaluation : 47/100
Extension 10 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if he's better trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 


FMG 10 - Nischal Cyril Kumar 

Quantitative evaluation : 40/100
Extension 20 days 

Qualitative evaluation  : Needs more extension to see if he's trainable 

Can focus on asking more questions and sharing and communicating more as well as maintaining continuity and consistency of work done 



Analysis of anonymized student feedback regarding Medicine department

Summary : This is a single observer review and analysis of student feedback regarding teaching delivery and formative assessment of medicine department received from a batch of students finishing their degree and on their way to finish the final hurdle of the university. The validity of this anonymized feedback appeared high as students had fearlessly opened their heart outs and well addressed our negatives as we had ensured that we were properly blinded to their identity.

The entire feedback in images of their hand written notes can be accessed here:https://37swetha.blogspot.com/2022/11/2018.html?m=1
The feedback has been analyzed and problem statements identified as well as solutions planned. 


Single observer analysis :

Clearly there is a gross mismatch with the departmental vision for the students learning and the students own vision of what their learning should be like and this post is to try and bridge this colossal gap. 


The departmental vision is to create physicians who are competent to understand a patient's problem through a proper clinical data capture (history, examination and investigations) and draw an optimal management plan tailored to the patient's requirements and ensure adequate follow up to support the patient's illness journey. 


The students vision apparent from the feedback is to pass their exams safely and learn standard clinical  skills that may not require the apparently humongous effort that they are having to put in compared to other subjects in their career journey. 


Also they are unable to sink their teeth into the kind of clinical skills we demand from them as they believe they haven't been taught anything and so we shouldn't expect them to know anything. 


Our current reading of this batch and most prior batches is that there are 5-10 students who can cope with the efforts necessary and the large majority is getting bulldozered and stressed out. 


Bottom line is lack of time as against a tremendous demand for efforts that appears unrealistic to the majority. 


Students want medicine to be broken down into bite sized conceptual chunks that may have palpable black and white outcomes but if we try to do that we will end up showing them an unreal picture of Medicine. What they are witnessing now through their own efforts to log a case is real medicine which is unfortunately disturbing as the messy real world of Medicine often is. However if we discount this discomfort now we shall only be delaying it and cause irreparable damage to their psyche when they are forced to face real medicine at a later date.  


What are the changes that the department can make from their side given the limited amount of time ? 


We can start the rounds after their last theory class at 10:15 AM sharp and students will need to assemble by each patient's bedside while we show them clinical skills during the rounds and then unfortunately we will still need to waste a lot of time trying to understand our real patient requirements that may feel like a waste now to students but will feel more useful with passage of time as they gain more competency in understanding patient requirements listening to their non linear narratives. 


What we need from the students? 


We need them to become active learners and transform from the passive learner role most of them have been forced into due to various reasons largely related to schooling. We need them to do their case based assignments and ask us questions at every step (asynchronously online) so that we can help them to create an impact on us and our patients. 

Ultimately it's this ability of theirs to create an impact on our learning ecosystem is what is most valuable and essentially what we are trying to assess. 


The online learning portfolios containing the case logged work of each medical student, are largely a platform for the medical students to demonstrate the impact of their learning on our department and patients in a manner that makes them become a valuable member of our team. This can enable us to demonstrate a clear correlation between their learning outcomes and patient outcomes. 


The way forward will not be easy but overcoming difficult paths can lead to better and greener pastures. 

Did the students provide valid feedback? 


The feedback collected from the students appears very valid as they have fearlessly addressed our negatives as we ensured that we were properly blinded to their identity 👇






Thursday, September 28, 2023

The Healthy plate diet in Bengali, Telegu

The copyright belongs to Harvard institution and this translation has been done by our patient advocates purely to help spread the message available in their publicly available (but not globally translated) webpage here :  https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-eating-plate/


Bengali :

আমাদের খাদ্য তালিকা এমন হওয়া উচিৎ যাতে আমাদের শরীরের ওজন না বৃদ্ধি পায় এবং আমাদের পেটের দৈর্ঘ ৮০ সেন্টিমিটারের নীচে থাকে ।


কী খাবেন না?


চিনি আর ময়দা জাতীয় খাদ্য পুরোপুরি বন্ধ। বিস্কুট আর পাউরুটি ময়দা দিয়ে তৈরি করা হয়, তাই বিস্কুট ও পাউরুটি খাওয়া বন্ধ রাখুন। তেল মাসে ৫০০ গ্রামের বেশি খাওয়া উচিৎ নয়।
কী খাবেন?


খাবারের থালার ৪০ ভাগ বিভিন্ন শাক সব্জি এবং ১০ ভাগ বিভিন্ন রঙের ফল থাকবে। বাকী অর্ধেকের অর্ধেক শ্বেতসার দানা শস্য যেমন চাল, গম ইত্যাদি ও কন্দ (আলু) জাতীয় খাদ্য থাকবে। বাকী অর্ধেক প্রটিন জাতীয় খাদ্য যেমন ভিভিন্ন মাছ, মাংস, বিভিন্ন বিন্স ও ডাল থাকবে। 


আপনার প্রতিটি খাবার প্লেট, প্রাতরাশ, মধ্যাহ্ন ভোজন, টিফিন বা নৈশ ভোজন সব ক্ষেত্রেই ওপরের  অনুপাতে হওয়া উচিৎ। এইটি সাধারন খাদ্য তালিকা, বাড়ির প্রতিটি সদস্য সঠিক ভাবে তা গ্রহণ করছেন তা লক্ষ্য রাখুন।


Telegu :

మన శరీర బరువు పెరగకుండా మరియు మన పొట్ట పొడవు 80 సెం.మీ కంటే తక్కువగా ఉండేలా మన ఆహారం ఉండాలి. ఏమి తినకూడదు? చక్కెర మరియు పిండితో కూడిన ఆహారం పూర్తిగా నిలిపివేయబడింది. బిస్కెట్లు మరియు బ్రెడ్ పిండితో తయారు చేస్తారు, కాబట్టి బిస్కెట్లు మరియు బ్రెడ్ తినడం మానేయండి. నెలకు 500 గ్రాముల కంటే ఎక్కువ నూనె వినియోగించరాదు. ఏమి తినాలి ఫుడ్ ప్లేట్‌లో 40% వివిధ ఆకుపచ్చ కూరగాయలు మరియు 10% వివిధ రంగుల పండ్లు. మిగిలిన సగంలో బియ్యం, గోధుమలు మొదలైన తెల్లటి గింజలు మరియు దుంపలు (బంగాళదుంపలు) ఉంటాయి.

Mana śarīra baruvu peragakuṇḍā mariyu mana poṭṭa poḍavu 80 seṁ.Mī kaṇṭē takkuvagā uṇḍēlā mana āhāraṁ uṇḍāli. Ēmi tinakūḍadu? Cakkera mariyu piṇḍitō kūḍina āhāraṁ pūrtigā nilipivēyabaḍindi. Biskeṭlu mariyu breḍ piṇḍitō tayāru cēstāru, kābaṭṭi biskeṭlu mariyu breḍ tinaḍaṁ mānēyaṇḍi. Nelaku 500 grāmula kaṇṭē ekkuva nūne viniyōgin̄carādu. Ēmi tināli phuḍ plēṭ‌lō 40% vividha ākupacca kūragāyalu mariyu 10% vividha raṅgula paṇḍlu. Migilina saganlō biyyaṁ, gōdhumalu modalaina tellaṭi gin̄jalu mariyu dumpalu (baṅgāḷadumpalu) uṇṭāyi.






Submitted internship competence assessment online portfolio links toward 360 degree peer feedback and assessment

Summary: Shared below is an evolving model of patient centered, evidence based, user driven submissions of online portfolio links on learning themes for 360 degree peer feedback and assessment. 



Submissions :System 2 shared logging under four themes  toward peer review and critical appraisal feedback 

FMG from Phillipines :

1) Self reflective writing on their medical student career 



2) Evidence based date wise workflow logs collated by the intern with clickable and verifiable links 



3) Anecdotal self reflections on their internship learning with some video  evidence of procedures performed 




4) Case based OSCE along with Bloom's learning levels acheived 


Submitted by IMG Telangana 2018 entry

1)

A) Self reflective writing on their medical student career 



LLM driven assessment promoted by collectively gathered UDLCO 

"Let's evaluate the provided writing of the intern both in terms of Bloom's taxonomy and the specified rubric questions:

**1. Bloom's Taxonomy Evaluation:**

- **Knowledge (Remembering):** The intern successfully gathers basic patient information such as history, presenting complaints, personal and family history, and examination findings. This demonstrates knowledge application at the remembering level.

- **Comprehension (Understanding):** The intern understands the patient's condition by correlating the symptoms, physical findings, and laboratory results. This level of comprehension is evident in the diagnosis section.

- **Application (Applying):** The intern applies medical knowledge by ordering relevant investigations like serology, RBS, B.urea, S.Cr, and ECG, and interprets these results to make a diagnosis. They also prescribe medications and treatment, which reflects the application of medical interventions.

- **Analysis (Analyzing):** The report lacks in-depth analysis of the patient's condition. While a diagnosis is provided, there is limited discussion of the underlying pathophysiology or potential differential diagnoses. An in-depth analysis would involve considering various possibilities and critically evaluating them.

- **Synthesis (Creating):** The intern does not demonstrate synthesis in the report. They do not connect the patient's condition to broader medical concepts or research. Synthesis would involve exploring how this case fits into the larger context of COPD, acute cor pulmonale, and other related conditions.

- **Evaluation (Evaluating):** The report does not include an evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment plan, the potential complications, or the overall management strategy. This is an important aspect that could improve the report's quality.

**2. Rubric Evaluation:**

- **General Knowledge Learning Points:** The report provides basic information about the patient's condition, such as symptoms, examination findings, and lab results. However, it lacks insights into the broader implications or epidemiology of COPD or acute cor pulmonale. It also doesn't reference external sources or guidelines for further context.

- **Discovery-Driven Learning Questions:** The report mentions the patient's history and symptoms but does not delve into specific questions related to the internal or external medicine aspects of the case. It could benefit from exploring questions like the cause of the acute exacerbation, the role of smoking cessation, or the relationship between COPD and heart failure.

- **Clinical Complexity:** The report briefly touches on the patient's clinical complexity, mentioning comorbidities like diabetes and hypertension. However, a deeper analysis of the biological, psychological, and social aspects of the patient's condition is lacking.

- **Thematic Analysis:** The report does not conduct a thematic analysis of the patient's case or identify overarching themes that could provide insights or guidance for future management.

- **Impact on Patient Outcomes:** The report does not discuss the potential positive or negative impacts of the diagnosis and treatment on the patient's short-term and long-term outcomes.

- **Competence of the Intern:**
  - (i) **Competence in Data Capture:** The intern successfully captures the patient's data, including history, examination findings, and lab results.
  - (ii) **Competence in Asking Questions:** The report lacks in-depth questioning and exploration of the case. It does not effectively sort themes for thematic analysis.
  - (iii) **Competence in Finding Answers:** The intern makes a diagnosis and prescribes treatment but does not engage in in-depth analysis or exploration of new knowledge.
  - (iv) **Competence in Communication:** The report could improve in communicating the case's learning points effectively, particularly in relation to how the findings could influence patient outcomes and future research.

In summary, while the medical report demonstrates competence at the knowledge and comprehension levels of Bloom's taxonomy, it falls short in terms of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Additionally, it lacks depth in addressing the rubric's questions related to clinical complexity, thematic analysis, and the impact on patient outcomes. Enhancing critical thinking and providing more comprehensive insights would improve the report's quality."

B) Evidence based date wise workflow logs collated by the intern with clickable and verifiable links 



C) Anecdotal self reflections on their internship learning with some video  evidence of procedures performed 


D) Case based OSCE along with Bloom's learning levels acheived 




2) IMG Telangana  2018 entry  


1) Self reflective writing on their medical student career 



2) Evidence based date wise workflow logs collated by the intern with clickable and verifiable links 



3) Anecdotal self reflections on their internship learning with some video  evidence of procedures performed 



4) Case based OSCE along with 
Bloom's learning levels achieved 

3) 


A) Self reflective writing on their medical student career 



B) Evidence based date wise workflow logs collated by the intern with clickable and verifiable links 


C) Anecdotal self reflections on their internship learning with some video  evidence of procedures performed 



D) Case based OSCE along with Bloom's learning levels acheived 


To all interns (past, present and future): 

In our 360 degree learning completion assessment, leaves don't matter as much. 

What you learned during your internship matters most along with evidence of your learning experiences in your online learning portfolio. 

Check out the 4 online portfolios by Nikhil Sai and 3 others posted in this ward group and start providing your peer review feedback on each of them as already demonstrated above by @⁨Rahul healthcare 2.0⁩  as a start and continuation of your osce.

Osce will never be completed till the end of their internship. It can only be started. The earlier the start more the advantage to the learning ecosystem. 

We shall only declare the results around who did well (and may get to present in the optimizing clinical complexity 2024  CPD) and who got 30 days extension all with user driven evidence for this current group of 30 by 30th September. 

Each Intern will get 4 chances to complete their 30 day extensions well and after 4th attempt may again have to give UG NEET (worst case scenario)! 

Let me also red flag the one's started as well as at risk : 👇

1) @⁨~Nikhileshwar K⁩ 

2) @⁨~Madugula Vineeth⁩ 

3) @⁨~Santhoshini Madupu⁩ 

4) @⁨~Bhargavi⁩ 

5) @⁨~Hemanth Mandava⁩ 

6) @⁨~Bhavya Popuri⁩ 

7) @mahitha 

8) @⁨~Tejaswini Kandhada⁩ 

9) @⁨~ASHRAF⁩ 

10) @⁨~Prasanna⁩ 

11) @⁨~Keerthana⁩ 

12) @⁨Metapsyched Intern (not Metapsychist)⁩ 

13) @⁨~Lasya Reddy⁩ 

14) @⁨Sampath Kasarabadha Kims 2018 UG⁩ 

15) @⁨~Cherish Kandru⁩ 

16) @⁨Nikhilsai Karnati 2018 Kims UG⁩ 

17) @⁨~Bindu⁩ 

18) @⁨~Khushi Tulsyan⁩ 

19) @⁨~Nischal cyril⁩ 

20) @⁨~Aarthi Priyanka⁩ 

Extended 30 days:

21) @⁨~Yamini⁩ 

21a)@⁨~Bhargavi⁩ 

Extended 45 days 

22) @Pardhu

Background :  [9/18, 9:20 PM] PG Medicine Haripriya KIMS 2021: @⁨~Keerthana⁩ @⁨~Madugula Vineeth⁩ 
@mahitha
@⁨Nikhilsai Karnati 2018 Kims UG⁩ 
Get ready with your opd and ward cases tomorrow morning at 10:00am for your assessment..
[9/18, 9:36 PM] Rakesh Biswas: Please be ready with as many opd and IPD cases as you can. 

The osce doesn't end tomorrow. It continues with your continued sharing on those and other new cases over the subsequent days
[9/18, 10:30 PM] Rakesh Biswas: The following sample links are what needs to be seen in every intern's online learning portfolio before making them eligible for the internship completion:


1) Self reflective writing on their medical student career 




2) Evidence based date wise workflow logs collated by the intern with clickable and verifiable links 




3) Anecdotal self reflections on their internship learning with some video  evidence of procedures performed 




4) Case based OSCE along with Bloom's learning levels acheived