Sunday, November 21, 2021

Thesis 2012-2013 Resolving diagnostic uncertainty in fever patients using fever and symptom pattern recognition by Dr Himanshu Jain, Bhopal

 TITLE:   Minimizing Antibiotic Usage for Poorly localizable fevers of short duration in Adults using a Check List and Temperature Monitoring.

PLACE OF STUDY: The study was conducted in Medicine, Peoples Hospital, PCMS & RC, Bhopal, M.P.

STUDY DESIGN – It was Prospective Observational Study.

STUDY PERIOD – over one year

SAMPLE SIZE - 500 patients

SAMPLE POPULATION -Patients of age 14-50 yrs attending Medicine Department in PCMS & RC, Bhanpur, Bhopal.


INCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Written informed consent from each patient or legal guardian prior to enrollment.

  2. Patients Age 14 to 50 years

  3. Recent-onset fever (within one to five days) when the diagnostic uncertainty is high.

  4. Symptoms commonly suggestive of self-limiting flu like illnesses such as myalgia, arthralgia with commonly known symptoms indicating involvement of upper respiratory tract such as cough, rhinorrhoea, frontal headache etc. 


EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  1. Obvious clinical localization for fever such as pneumonia, meningitis, urinary tract infection etc.

  2. Clinical diagnosis suggesting important clinical localizations such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascitis.

  3. Elderly, underlying immunosuppression or any associated conditions predisposing to severe infections such as diabetes.


CONSENT: 

Written and informed consent in local language was obtained prior to enrollment in study.

ETHICAL APPROVAL: 

Institutional Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee at Peoples Hospital, Barkatullah University, Bhopal.

METHOD OF STUDY:

Five hundred clinically matched patients over one year presenting with recent-onset fever to the Peoples Hospital PCMS & RC, Bhopal, was prospectively monitored for fever, duration of illness and satisfaction levels. 

In fever patients presenting to PCMS&RC we had used a check list to allocate suitable patients to just antipyretics and/or antibiotics and temperature charting for 2 days (extended to 4 days if fever persists but lesser number of fever episodes per day and temperature spikes <1030F) and study their health care outcomes. After monitoring for two days if the fever shows a progression only then antibiotics been instituted. (depending on the judgment of the treating physician). 

Two groups were studied:

Group A – 

This group comprise of patients encountered by investigators (not blinded to the patient’s inclusion status in the study), they waited two days before taking a decision on antibiotics after selecting patients for the above on the basis of inclusion criteria and continue to encourage monitoring of their fever patterns over two days. 

Group B – 

This group comprise of patients encountered by Physicians delivering their usual care for fever (as per their prevailing clinical judgment). They remained blinded to the patient’s status in the study.

Patient’s recruitment was done through OPD attender from OPD and was alternately allocated in each group. Patients been recruited such that to cover all seasons in a year. OPD Patients were advised Temperature charting 8 hourly and also during fever episodes for 2 days (duration been extended for 4 days if fever persists but with lesser number of fever episodes per day and temperature spikes <1030F). Patients who were admitted in hospital, their temperature been monitored by patient itself or by his/her relative or by nursing staff. 

Patient reviewed after 2 days by personal appearance or Phone call for follow up about temperature charting, fever pattern, duration of illness/time to recovery, events inbetween two days if any, check list score and satisfaction level on VAS. A Check List being provided for deciding whether to use antibiotic or not during the course of illness or to explain whether Antibiotic need was there or not. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) being used before and after the illness to access the satisfaction level of Patient’s. Patient was advised to report immediately for any urgent need.

STUDY TOOLS –

  1. Mercury Thermometer.

  2. Check List.

  3. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

             

                          CHECK LIST

                         (To decide whether to use Antibiotics or Not)


- Cough with sputum production/ haemoptysis

 / Breathlessness                                                        0 1


-  Chest pain, palpitation                                                0 1


- Tachypnoea, Hypotension                                           0 1


- Epigastric or right hypochondrial or 

  right iliac fossa (abdominal) pain / jaundice                0 1                               


-Vomiting and/or constipation or diarrhoea                   0 1

-  Burning micturition/pain during micturition and 

   Low back pain/ Urinary dysuria                                   0 1


- Yellow discolouration of sclera                                    0 1


-  Confusion, altered sensorium                                       0 1


- Black coloured stool (malena) and/or blood                 0 1

In vomiting


 - Immunosuppressive conditions like                            0 1

 Diabetes/CRF (kidney failure)/Malignancy/HIV

 /Any chronic illness                                                      


  • High grade  fever (>1030F)/ continuous fever          0 1


  • Neck pain/Neck stiffness                                          0 1






VISUAL ANALOUGE SCALE (VAS) – 


A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. 


READING AT THE TIME OF PRESENTATION-
 
1     2 3     4 5 6     7 8 9 10                                                                                                                                             
                                                             

The symbols indicate patient’s level of satisfaction/well-being with their current health.


READING AFTER RECOVERY


1     2 3     4 5 6     7 8 9 10

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

The symbols indicate patient’s level of satisfaction/well-being with their current health




                      

 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical analysis were done using SPSS software version 20. Average/median duration of fever will be ascertained. Dispersion in terms of range and standard deviation will be calculated. Antibiotic/ antipyretics consumptions will be associated/correlated by duration of fever by using Student T-test, and patient satisfaction through Mann-Whitney Test and appropriate statistical test.






                               OBSERVATION

The present study was conducted in Department of Medicine, Peoples Hospital PCMS & RC, Bhopal - a tertiary care centre from June 2012- May 2013. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee at Peoples Hospital, Barkatullah University, Bhopal.

.  A total of 500 subjects (246 males, 254 females) were recruited in the study. 

SEX

FREQUENCY

PERCENT

MALE

246

49.2

FEMALE

254

51.8

TOTAL

500

100.0











Group 


                  GROUP

Gender

Total

MALE

FEMALE


NO ANTIBIOTIC

118

132

250


ANTIBOITIC

128

122

250

                    Total

246

254

500












T-Test –



Group Statistics


Group

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

DURATION OF ILLNESS

NO ANTIBIOTIC

250

2.57

1.008

.064

ANTIBOITIC

250

2.58

1.070

.068

NO. OF FEVER SPIKES

NO ANTIBIOTIC

250

2.13

1.607

.102

ANTIBOITIC

250

2.13

1.513

.096

Thursday, November 18, 2021

Medicine paper for Nov 2021 bimonthly blended assessment

18/11/2021 9:00 PM


Answer all questions:                                                      

Max Marks: 100 (5 questions in total and 20 marks for each  answer) 

Submit by:   25/09/2021               

Please be original and refrain from plagiarism. Please note that every logged answer paper should contain the link to this current "assignment/question paper" page and the patient context for each answer. Also share the detailed online links to every quote or reference cited in your answer. 



Questions plan and context:

All questions are around student driven patient centered case reports prepared by our students from our real but deidentified patients. These cases have also been discussed in theory lectures as well as practical training sessions which are available here : https://medicinedepartment.blogspot.com/2021/10/updated-october-2021-weekly-log-and.html?m=0

Please review one E logged case report link around our current cases (uploaded anywhere between a few days of this post) by one of our 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019 students in their links available from the LOR link below :





Q1) (Testing peer review competency in the active reader of this assignment) :

Please go through the current case reports in the links shared above and provide your critical appraisal of the captured data in terms of completeness, correctness and ability to provide useful leads to analyze the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties around the cases shared.


Q2: Testing scholarship competency of the examinees ( ability to read comprehend, analyze, reflect upon and discuss captured patient centered data):

Please analyze the linked case report current patient data by first preparing a problem list for each patient in order of perceived priority (based on the shared data) and then discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty around solving those problems. 

Q3) Include the review of literature around sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic interventions mentioned and same around efficacy of the therapeutic interventions mentioned for each patient. 

Q4) Testing leadership competency in patient data capture and representation through ethical case reporting/case presentation with informed consent from body language of the presenter :

Share the link to your own case report this month of a patient that you connected with and engaged while capturing his her sequential life events before and after the illness and clinical and investigational images along with your discussion of that case. 

Please attach a link to your latest YouTube video of your case presentation to assess your current leadership competency expressed in non verbal cues. Check out other shared YouTube videos of prior student's presentations here : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvYjjuT_hEEQDtlHSAvFdRpCb5EBszwgR


Q 5) Testing scholarship competency in  
logging reflective observations on your concrete experiences of this last month : (10 marks) 

Reflective logging  of one's own experiences is a vital tool toward competency development in medical education and research. 

A sample answer to this last assignment around sharing your experience log of the month can be seen in one student's  answer to Q10 in the  May 2021 assignment in the link below:


And another student answer to Q5 in the June and July 2021 assignment in the links below :




Please reflect on and share  your learning experiences from the  hospital as well as community  patients over the last month particularly while you were E logging their case report.

Wednesday, November 17, 2021

BDS 2018 II - INTERNAL ASSESSMENT EXAMINATION question paper

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL MEDICINE

II - INTERNAL ASSESSMENT EXAMINATION

Date: 15.11.2021

Time: 10 am to 1 pm

Note: Answer all questions                                        Max Marks: 70


  1. Anatomical and etiologic localization for hemiparesis and further management        1x9=9





  1. Etiology pathogenesis clinical features management complications of acute pancreatitis.      1x9=9

Real patient context :



Write Short Notes on                                      8x4=32


1) Dengue Fever clinical features and complications.



2) Cushing syndrome.


3) Mandibular advancement device.


4) Cardiogenic pulmonary edema.


5) Rheumatoid arthritis.


6) Leptospirosis.


7) Heart failure.



8) Ascites.



Write Briefly on                                         10x2=20

  1. Pyrexia of unknown origin.



12) Drug induced liver injury.



13) Evaluation of low back ache.



14) Renal artery stenosis.


15) Acute kidney injury.


16) Oral hypoglycemic agent.


17) Micro vascular and macro vascular complications of diabetes.



18) Lights criteria.


19) Metabolic acidosis


20) Iron deficiency anemia.